랩터 인터내셔널에 오신걸 환영 합니다

logo

  • head
  • news
  • product
  • mobile
  • benchmark
  • analysis
  • computing
  • multimedia
삼성은 9일(미국 시간) 다이당 ...
인텔이 최근 발매한 최신 데...
웨스턴디지털은 HGST 브랜드...
HPE는 인텔 제온 프로세...
2017년 2분기 전세계 노트북...
인공지능(AI), 오프라인 매장에서...
□ 개요 o Adobe社는 Adobe Flash ...

IMG_4621.jpg




 Vega Frontier EditionTitan XpGTX 1080 TiTitan X (Pascal)GTX 1080TITAN XGTX 980R9 Fury XR9 Fury
GPUVegaGP102GP102GP102GP104GM200GM204Fiji XTFiji Pro
GPU Cores409638403584358425603072204840963584
Base Clock1382 MHz1480 MHz1480 MHz1417 MHz1607 MHz1000 MHz1126 MHz1050 MHz1000 MHz
Boost Clock1600 MHz1582 MHz1582 MHz1480 MHz1733 MHz1089 MHz1216 MHz--
Texture Units?224224224160192128256224
ROP Units649688966496646464
Memory16GB12GB11GB12GB8GB12GB4GB4GB4GB
Memory Clock1890 MHz11400 MHz11000 MHz10000 MHz10000 MHz7000 MHz7000 MHz1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Interface2048-bit HBM2384-bit G5X352-bit384-bit G5X256-bit G5X384-bit256-bit4096-bit (HBM)4096-bit (HBM)
Memory Bandwidth483 GB/s547.7 GB/s484 GB/s480 GB/s320 GB/s336 GB/s224 GB/s512 GB/s512 GB/s
TDP300 watts250 watts250 watts250 watts180 watts250 watts165 watts275 watts275 watts
Peak Compute13.1 TFLOPS12.0 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS10.1 TFLOPS8.2 TFLOPS6.14 TFLOPS4.61 TFLOPS8.60 TFLOPS7.20 TFLOPS
Transistor Count?12.0B12.0B12.0B7.2B8.0B5.2B8.9B8.9B
Process Tech14nm16nm16nm16nm16nm28nm28nm28nm28nm
MSRP (current)$999$1200$699$1,200$599$999$499$649$549


AMD의 가장 최신 기술로 개발된 신형 GPU 라데온 베가 프론티어 에디션 16GB. 스펙은 기존 R9 Fury X와 비슷하며(4096 코어) 동작 클럭 상승, 16GB 2048-bit HBM2 적용, 글로벌 파운드리 14나노 공정, TDP는 300와트, 가격은 999달러


베가 프론티어 에디션 외형


View Full Size


View Full Size


View Full Size


View Full Size




테스트 시스템



 PC Perspective GPU Testbed
ProcessorIntel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E
MotherboardASUS Rampage V Extreme X99
MemoryG.Skill Ripjaws 16GB DDR4-3200
StorageOCZ Agility 4 256GB (OS)
Adata SP610 500GB (games)
Power SupplyCorsair AX1500i 1500 watt
OSWindows 10 x64
DriversAMD: 17.6 (Vega)
NVIDIA: 382.53






Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 16GB (300W), Average FPS Comparisons, Dirt Rally
 GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070R9 Fury X
2560x1440-37%-11%+2%+15%
3840x2160-37%-5%  


더트 랠리 : 베가 프론티어 에디션은 지포스GTX 1070 급 성능





Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 16GB (300W), Average FPS Comparisons, Fallout 4
 GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070R9 Fury X
2560x1440-32%-8%+10%+27%
3840x2160-39%-13%  


폴아웃4 : 베가 프론티어 에디션은 지포스GTX 1070 보다 10% 높은 성능





Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 16GB (300W), Average FPS Comparisons, Grand Theft Auto V
 GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070R9 Fury X
2560x1440-33%-31%-19%+16%
3840x2160-50%-31%  


GTA5 : 베가 프론티어 에디션은 지포스GTX 1070 보다 -19% 낮은 성능





Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 16GB (300W), Average FPS Comparisons, Hitman
 GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070R9 Fury X
2560x1440-30%-14%+32%+27%
3840x2160-33%-16%  


히트맨 : 베가 프론티어 에디션은 지포스GTX 1070 보다 32% 높은 성능





Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 16GB (300W), Average FPS Comparisons, Rise of the Tomb Raider
 GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070R9 Fury X
2560x1440-38%-13%+11%+46%
3840x2160-38%-14%  


톰레이더 : 베가 프론티어 에디션은 지포스GTX 1070 보다 11% 높은 성능





Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 16GB (300W), Average FPS Comparisons, The Witcher 3
 GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070R9 Fury X
2560x1440-38%-17%+1%+16%
3840x2160-40%-17%  


위처3 : 베가 프론티어 에디션은 지포스GTX 1070 급  성능


전력 소모

View Full Size


베가 프론티어 에디션의 전력소모는 테스트 카드 중 단연 1위

3DMark, Unigine Heaven

Let's look at a set of tests from more standard benchmarks like Unigine Heaven and the new 3DMark benchmark. 

I consider these tests to be somewhat of a "best case" for all the cards in our comparison.  We aren't using our frame capture system, we aren't measuring frame latency, nothing like that; I think this should give you an idea of graphics performance if each vendor had the best result for each game.

View Full Size

View Full Size

Looking at the synthetic benchmarks, we start with the classic 3DMark Fire Strike tests. The Extreme run shows a pretty reasonable performance edge from the Vega FE to the GTX 1080 of 6%, the closest gap we have seen so far. The Vega FE is even 14% faster than the GTX 1070 here. Looking at the Ultra preset, the GTX 1080 only has a 3% advantage.

View Full Size

Unigine Heaven continues to be a sore spot for Radeon graphics cards. With a score of 64.7 FPS, the Vega Frontier Edition is only 12% faster than the Fury X! That also leaves it 8.5% slower than the GTX 1070…



3DS Max Viewset (3dsmax-05)

View Full Size

The 3dsmax-05 viewset was created from traces of the graphics workload generated by 3ds Max 2016 using the default Nitrous DX11 driver.

The models for this viewset came from the SPECapc for 3ds Max 2015 benchmark and other sources. In order to best approximate real-world use cases, several tests incorporate multiple viewsets on screen, each using a different rendering method. The styles of rendering in the viewset reflect those most commonly used in major markets, including realistic, shaded and wireframe. Some lesser-used but interesting rendering modes such as facets, graphite and clay are also incorporated. The animations in the viewset are a combination of model spin and camera fly-through, depending on the model.

View Full Size

The Vega FE has a good showing on this viewset, producing a score 92% higher than the Radeon Pro Duo (single GPU) and coming within 20% of the Titan Xp.

CATIA Viewset (Catia-04)

View Full Size

The catia-04 viewset was created from traces of the graphics workload generated by the CATIA V6 R2012 application from Dassault Systemes. Model sizes range from 5.1 to 21 million vertices.

The viewset includes numerous rendering modes supported by the application, including wireframe, anti-aliasing, shaded, shaded with edges, depth of field, and ambient occlusion

View Full Size

The two Radeon cards scale well with Catia, with the Vega Frontier Edition getting a win over the Titan Xp by 25% or so. But notice that the Quadro P5000, which is essentially identical hardware to the GTX 1080, is noticeably faster than the Titan Xp, indicate work and improvement from the Quadro driver stack.

Creo viewset (Creo-01)

View Full Size

The creo-01 viewset was created from traces of the graphics workload generated by the Creo 2™ application from PTC. Model sizes range from 20 to 48 million vertices.

The viewset includes numerous rendering modes supported by the application, including wireframe, anti-aliasing, shaded, shaded with edges, and shaded reflection modes.

View Full Size

Creo uses a super high poly count model for a portion of its workload and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition does exceedingly well, besting the Titan Xp by 48%.

Energy Viewset (Energy-01)

View Full Size

The energy-01 viewset is representative of a typical volume rendering application in the seismic and oil and gas fields. Similar to medical imaging such as MRI or CT, geophysical surveys generate image slices through the subsurface that are built into a 3D grid. Volume rendering provides a 2D projection of this 3D volumetric grid for further analysis and interpretation.

At every frame, depending on the viewer position, a series of coplanar slices aligned with the viewing angle are computed on the CPU and then sent to the graphics hardware for texturing and further calculations such as transfer function lookup, lighting and clipping to reveal internal structures. Finally, the slices are blended together before the image is displayed.

View Full Size

The Energy viewset gives the Radeon Vega FE another win over the Titan Xp as well as the Quadro P5000.

Maya viewset (maya-04)

View Full Size

The maya-04 viewset was created from traces of the graphics workload generated by the Maya 2013 application from Autodesk. Model size is 727,500 vertices.

The viewset includes numerous rendering modes supported by the application, including shaded mode, ambient occlusion, multi-sample anti aliasing, and transparency.

View Full Size

The Maya workload shows good scaling from the single GPU Radeon Pro duo test to the Vega FE (75%) though the Titan Xp still has a significant advantage over the rest of the field.

Medical Viewset (Medical-01)

View Full Size

The medical-01 viewset is representative of a typical volume rendering application that renders a 2D projection of a 3D volumetric grid. A typical 3D grid in this viewset is a group of 3D slices acquired by a scanner (such as CT or MRI).

At every frame, depending on the viewer position, a series of coplanar slices aligned with the viewing angle are computed on the CPU and then sent to the graphics hardware for texturing and further calculations, such as transfer function lookup, lighting and clipping to reveal internal structures. Finally, the slices are blended together before the image is displayed.

View Full Size

Using the Medical viewset swaps the win back in favor of AMD, with the Radeon Vega FE card providing a 40% advantage over the Titan Xp.

Showcase Viewset (showcase-01)

View Full Size

The showcase-01 viewset was created from traces of Autodesk’s Showcase 2013 application. The model used in the viewset consists of 8 million vertices.

The viewset is the first viewset in SPECviewperf to feature DX rendering. Rendering modes included in the viewset include shading, projected shadows, and self-shadows.

View Full Size

The Showcase viewset utilizes DX11 for rendering and the advantages that the GeForce products offer here stand out. The Titan Xp is 47% faster than the Vega FE.

Siemens NX (snx-02)

View Full Size

The snx-02 viewset was created from traces of the graphics workload generated by the NX 8.0 application from Siemens PLM. Model sizes range from 7.15 to 8.45 million vertices.

View Full Size

The scores for the Radeon Pro Duo and the Titan Xp, in contrast with the scores from the Quadro and Vega cards, indicate there is a significant software difference between these driver configurations. The Vega Frontier Edition does impressively well, coming within 30% of the Quadro P5000.

Solidworks viewset (sw-03)

View Full Size

The sw-03 viewset was created from traces of Dassault Systemes’ SolidWorks 2013 SP1 application. Models used in the viewset range in size from 2.1 to 21 million vertices.

The viewset includes numerous rendering modes supported by the application, including shaded mode, shaded with edges, ambient occlusion, shaders, and environment maps.

View Full Size

Finally, the Solidworks viewset has the Radeon Vega FE well ahead of the Titan Xp (73%) but falling shore of all three of the Quadro family of products.

LuxMark 3.1

View Full Size

GPGPU compute performance is a big part of any modern GPU design, especially in the workstation environment. LuxMark is a long-standing OpenCL benchmark, based on the LuxRender engine and provides a good look at how different GPU architectures compare in typical OpenCL workloads. Today we are testing our field of graphics cards in the most compute intensive scene, Hotel.

View Full Size

With a score of 4690, the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition performs 41% faster than the Quadro P5000 (GTX 1080 equivalent) and than the Radeon Pro Duo running on a single GPU (essentially a Fury X). That’s a big shift from the gaming results we just went through on the preceding pages. NVIDIA’s Titan Xp though was able to bring a score of 5800, giving it a 23% advantage over AMD’s middle-level pro-sumer graphics offering.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL

The performance depends on various factors, such as the GPU processor on your hardware, on the drivers used. The graphics card has to display a huge amount of geometry (nearly 1 million polygons) and textures, as well as a variety of effects, such as environments, bump maps, transparency, lighting and more to evaluate the performance across different disciplines and give a good average overview of the capabilities of your graphics hardware. The result is measured in frames per second (fps). The higher the number, the faster your graphics card is.

View Full Size

We quickly tossed in CineBench R15 as an OpenGL rending test and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition does very well, scoring 151.85 FPS compared to the Titan Xp at 144.19 FPS. 

We do plan to run a more extensive set of professional application tests as time permits. For this review, we focused most of our available time on the gaming angle of this architecture.


출처 - https://www.pcper.com


AMD의 신형 라데온 베가 프론티어 에디션은 16GB 용량의 HBM2 기술까지 적용했으나 성능은 엔비디아의 지포스 1070 ~ 1080 중간에 위치하며 1070에 가까운 성능이다. TDP는 무려 300와트로 매우 낮은 와트당 성능을 나타내며 엔비디아와 AMD 간의 GPU 기술 격차가 더욱 확대되고 있다.






  1. 라데온RX 베가 56 & 64 성능 확인 (Radeon RX Vega 64 & 56)

    AMD Radeon RX Series Specification Comparison AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 LiquidAMD Radeon RX Vega 64AMD Radeon RX Vega 56AMD Radeon R9 Fury XStream Processors4096 (64 CUs)4096 (64 CUs)3584 (56 CUs)4096 (64 CUs)Texture Units256256224256ROPs6464646...
    Date2017.08.15 CategoryGPU Reply6 Views1602
    Read More
  2. AMD 라데온 베가 RX 64 8GB vs. 지포스GTX 1080 성능비교

    AMD가 새로 발표한 플래그십 GPU, 라데온 베가RX 64의 탐스 하드웨어 리뷰입니다. 베가 외형 라데온 베가는 AMD의 새로운 아키텍처로 설계된 GPU 입니다. 베가 아키텍처 상세 내...
    Date2017.08.15 CategoryGPU Reply4 Views1305
    Read More
  3. 공식) AMD 라이젠 스레드리퍼 1950X 성능 확인

    Threadripper 1950X Core i9-7900X Threadripper 1920X Core i7-7820X Threadripper 1900X Price $999 $999 $799 $599 $549 Interface/Chipset TR4 / X399 LGA2066 / X299 TR4 / X399 LGA2066 / X299 TR4 / X399 Cores/Threads 16/32 ...
    Date2017.08.11 CategoryCPU Reply4 Views1347
    Read More
  4. AMD 라이젠3 1300X, 1200 vs. 인텔 i3 7100 / G4560 대결

    AMD Ryzen SKUs Cores/ ThreadsBase/ TurboXFRL3TDPRetail 7/27CoolerRyzen 7 1800X8/163.6/4.0+10016 MB95 W$419-Ryzen 7 1700X8/163.4/3.8+10016 MB95 W$299-Ryzen 7 17008/163.0/3.7+5016 MB65 W$279Spire RGBRyzen 5 1600X6/123.6/4.0+10016 MB95 W$...
    Date2017.07.29 CategoryCPU Reply3 Views4069
    Read More
  5. AMD 라데온 베가 프론티어 에디션 16GB 성능 공개

    Vega Frontier EditionTitan XpGTX 1080 TiTitan X (Pascal)GTX 1080TITAN XGTX 980R9 Fury XR9 FuryGPUVegaGP102GP102GP102GP104GM200GM204Fiji XTFiji ProGPU Cores409638403584358425603072204840963584Base Clock1382 MHz1480...
    Date2017.07.01 CategoryGPU Reply5 Views5336
    Read More
  6. 인텔 스카이레이크X 7900X, 7820X, 7800X, 카비레이크X 7740 테스트

    마침내 등장한 인텔 스카이레이크X 7900X, 7820X, 7800X, 카비레이크X 7740 테스트 출처 - http://www.anandtech.com Skylake-X Processors (Low Core Count Chips) Core i7-7800XCore i7-7820XCore i9-7900XCores / Threads6/128/1610/20Ba...
    Date2017.06.25 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views2849
    Read More
  7. 게이밍 환경에서 AMD 라이젠 vs. 인텔 CPU 성능 비교

    게이밍 환경에서 인텔 VS AMD CPU 성능 비교 / https://www.techpowerup.com AMD 선수 : 라이젠 1800X - 1700X - 1700 - 1600X - 1600 - 1500X - 1400 인텔 선수 : 코어 7700K - 6700K - 7600K - 7500 - 7400 - 7100 - G4560 [ 테스트 시스템 ] ...
    Date2017.06.11 CategoryCPU Reply8 Views13848
    Read More
  8. 5~6만원선 140mm 슬림 타워 CPU 쿨러 4종 벤치마크

    140mm Tower CPU CoolersProductFan(s)Fan Speed (RPM)Height (mm/in)Current Retail PricingNoctua NH-U14S1 × 140 mm1500 RPM165 mm / 6.5”$65Phanteks PH-TC14S1 × 140 mm1300 RPM160 mm / 6.3”$50ThermalRight True Spirit 140 Direct1 × 140 mm1600 RPM16...
    Date2017.05.27 CategoryETC Reply0 Views1408
    Read More
  9. 갤럭시 S8 Vs. LG G6 카메라 성능 비교 (ITworld)

    Jason Cross, Adam Patrick Murray | Greenbot 지난 해, Greenbot은 삼성 갤럭시 S7, LG V20, 아이폰 7을 누르고 구글 픽셀을 스마트폰 카메라 1위로 선정했다. 그리고 지난 달, 픽셀은 LG G6를 상대로 방어전을 치렀으나 패배하고 말았다. 이제 새로운 ...
    Date2017.05.13 CategoryETC Reply3 Views1264
    Read More
  10. AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB Review, Polaris 12 GPU

    AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB Review - http://www.tomshardware.com Radeon RX 550 Radeon R7 260X Radeon RX 460 Shader Units 512896 896ROPs16 16 16 GPUPolaris 12 Bonaire Polaris 11 Transistors2.2 Billion 2.08 Billion 3 Billion Memory Size 2GB2GB...
    Date2017.05.01 CategoryGPU Reply3 Views1433
    Read More
  11. AMD 라데온RX 580 & RX 570 리뷰 : A Second Path to Polaris

    AMD가 새로 발표한 RX 580 & RX 570 리뷰 AMD Radeon RX Series Specification Comparison AMD Radeon RX 580 (8GB)AMD Radeon RX 570AMD Radeon RX 480 (8GB)AMD Radeon RX 470Stream Processors2304 (36 CUs)2048 (32 CUs)2304 (36 CUs)2048 (32...
    Date2017.04.23 CategoryGPU Reply6 Views3801
    Read More
  12. AMD 라이젠5 1600X, 1500X 성능 vs 인텔 7600k

    Ryzen 5는 선행 발매된 Ryzen 7의 하위 브랜드로 ZEN 마이크로 아키텍처를 바탕으로 14nm FinFET 프로세스에서 제조된 CPU 제품군이다. Ryzen 5의 라인업에는 6코어 CPU와 4코어 CPU가 혼재하는데 이번 테스트의 Ryzen 5 1600X는 6코어 12스레드 CP...
    Date2017.04.16 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views6210
    Read More
  13. 퀄컴 스냅드래곤 835 vs 애플 A10 AP 성능 비교

    Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs: Three GenerationsSoCSnapdragon 835 (MSM8998)Snapdragon 820 / 821 (MSM8996 / MSM8996 Pro)Snapdragon 810 (MSM8994)CPU4x Kryo 280 Performance @ 2.45GHz 4x Kryo 280 Efficiency @ 1.90GHz2x Kryo @ 2.15GHz / 2.34GHz ...
    Date2017.04.08 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views752
    Read More
  14. 라이젠 1800X+지포스GTX 1080TI 조합 vs 인텔 조합 게임 대결

    신형 지포스GTX 1080TI와 8코어 16스레드 CPU 조합 성능 테스트 선수 1번은 인텔의 8코어 16스레드 Core i7 5960X + 지포스GTX 1080TI 조합 선수 2번은 AMD의 8코어 16스레드 라이젠 1800X + 지포스GTX 1080TI 조합 각각의 조합으로 여러 부문에서 성능...
    Date2017.03.11 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views28703
    Read More
  15. 지포스GTX 1080TI 성능, 파스칼 타이탄X보다 상위

    엔비디아가 새롭게 발표한 지포스GTX 1080TI 리뷰 GeForce GTX 980 TiRadeon R9 Fury XGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce Titan XPShader Units281640961920256035843584ROPs966464648896Graphics ProcessorGM200FijiGP104...
    Date2017.03.10 CategoryGPU Reply2 Views3026
    Read More
  16. 라이젠 1800X vs 브로드웰-E 6900K vs 카비레이크 7700K 한판

    라이젠 스펙 및 기본 정보들은 바로 아래 게시글들을 확인해주시기 바라며 벤치마크 데이터만 업데이트 합니다. 각각의 테스트 부문으로 인텔과 AMD CPU의 장단점을 비교해보시기 바랍니다. 출처 - 탐스 하드웨어 (http://www.tomshardware.co...
    Date2017.03.05 CategoryCPU Reply2 Views5872
    Read More
  17. AMD 라이젠 1800X vs 인텔 Core i7-5960X 성능 비교

    Ryzen 7 1800X ZEN 마이크로 아키텍처를 채용한 AMD의 새로운 CPU "Ryzen 7". 그 최상위 모델인 "Ryzen 7 1800X"를 발매 전 차용 기회를 얻어 벤치마크 테스트로 그 실력을 확인했다. 8코어 16스레드 CPU "Ryzen 7 1800X"Ryzen 7 1800X는 새로운 CP...
    Date2017.03.04 CategoryCPU Reply4 Views3902
    Read More
  18. AMD 라이젠 1800X, 1700X, 1700 정식 벤치마크 (게임 성능 제외)

    AMD Ryzen SKUs Cores/ ThreadsBase/ TurboL3TDPCostLaunch DateRyzen 7 1800X8/163.6/4.016 MB95 W$4993/2/2017Ryzen 7 1700X8/163.4/3.816 MB95 W$3993/2/2017Ryzen 7 17008/163.0/3.716 MB65 W$3293/2/2017 AMD가 마침내 신형 프로세서 "라이젠" 공...
    Date2017.03.03 CategoryCPU Reply4 Views4194
    Read More
  19. 쿼드코어 샌디브릿지 2600K vs 듀얼코어 카비레이크 7350K 성능 대결

    흥미로운 한판, 샌디브릿지 2600K vs 카비레이크 7350K 성능 대결 by http://www.anandtech.com CPU Die Size Comparison Numbers in table are to nearest degree of known accuracy Data from Intel or Trusted Sources (Chipworks/PCWatch)CPU...
    Date2017.02.10 CategoryCPU Reply3 Views4348
    Read More
  20. 인텔 카비레이크 Core i7 7700K 리뷰 - 새로운 챔피언

    인텔의 신형 7세대 카비레이크 7700K 리뷰 - http://www.anandtech.com Intel Kaby Lake S SKUs Cores/ ThreadsBase/ TurboIGPL3eDRAMTDPCosti7-7700K4/84.2/4.5HD 6308 MB-91 W$305i7-77004/83.6/4.2HD 6308 MB-65 W$272i7-7700T4/82.9/3.8HD 6308 MB-...
    Date2017.01.24 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views3854
    Read More
  21. 엔비디아 쿼드로 P6000 테스트, 파스칼 타이탄X 격파

    엔비디아 쿼드로 P6000 스펙 그래픽 아키텍처 : 파스칼 쿠다코어 : 3840 (파스칼 타이탄X : 3584) 베이스 클럭 : 1417MHz 부스트 클럭 : 1530MHz 싱글 프리시전 성능 : 12테라플롭스 메모리 대역 : 432 기가바이트 퍼 세컨드 그...
    Date2017.01.04 CategoryGPU Reply3 Views1959
    Read More
  22. 플렉스터 M8Pe 512GB SSD 리뷰 (NVMe PCIe 3.0)

    Plextor M8Pe Series Specifications Comparison 128 GB256 GB512 GB1 TBForm FactorM8PeY: Half height half length PCIe add-in card (HHHL) M8PeG: M.2 2280 with heatspreader M8PeGN: M.2 2280 without heatspreaderControllerMarvell 88...
    Date2016.12.30 CategorySTR Reply0 Views1974
    Read More
  23. AMD 라데온 소프트웨어 크림슨 ReLive 에디션 테스트

    AMD는 12월 8일 그래픽 드라이버의 최신판 "Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition"을 공개했다. 이번에 이 드라이버에서 새로 추가된 2개의 새 기능과 드라이버 업데이트에 의한 성능 향상을 점검한다. 게임 녹화 기능 ReLive가 추가된 2세대 라데온 ...
    Date2016.12.09 CategoryS/W Reply3 Views1956
    Read More
  24. ADATA XPG SX8000 M.2 SSD 투입, 실력 체크

    방열판을 장착하고 가격도 지금까지의 제품에 비해 훨씬 저렴해진 PLEXTOR "M8PeG" 시리즈를 시작으로 TLC 3D NAND 플래시를 채용한 인텔 "600p"시리즈 등 신제품이 속속 등장하고있다. 재입고를 기다리는 사람이 많을 PHM2-GB 시리즈. 유통량이 증가...
    Date2016.11.27 CategorySTR Reply0 Views1308
    Read More
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 22 Next
/ 22