하스웰 리프레시 성능 리뷰 : Core i7-4790, i5-4690, i3-4360

by 연대생 posted May 11, 2014
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

ESC닫기

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄

CPU1_678x452.jpg

 

 

인텔이 하스웰 리프레시와 이를 지원하는 인텔 9시리즈 플랫폼 공식 발표

 

 

 

 

새로운 9시리즈는 구형 하스웰과 신형 하스웰 리프레시 모두 지원, 차세대 사타 익스프레스 기술 지원 / 향상된 RST 기술 / 디바이스 프로텍션 / 유연해진 IO 포트 지원, 인텔 스몰 비지니스 기술 향상, 래피드 스토리지 기술 향상 등

 

also routed via the CPU, not the chipset, which may be the reason).

The PCIe storage on 9-series is somewhat confusing. For clarity, let us return to the Flex IO system introduced with the 8-series:

 

 

PCI-EX 방식 M.2 스토리지 지원 강화, 유연해진 IO 포트 구성  

 

 

 

차세대 사타 익스프레스 인터페이스 지원

 

 

 

 

Intel Haswell Refresh CPU List (Desktop)
New SKU Cores  Base Turbo L3 Cache IGP TDP / W Intel
List
Price
Celeron G1840 2 / 2 2800 - 2 MB HD (Haswell) 53 $42
Celeron G1840T 2 / 2 2500 - 2 MB HD (Haswell) 35 $42
Celeron G1850 2 / 2 2900 - 2 MB HD (Haswell) 53 $52
Pentium G3240 2 / 2 3100 - 3 MB HD (Haswell) 53 $64
Pentium G3240T 2 / 2 2700 - 3 MB HD (Haswell) 35 $64
Pentium G3440 2 / 2 3300 - 3 MB HD (Haswell) 53 $75
Pentium G3440T 2 / 2 2800 - 3 MB HD (Haswell) 35 $75
Pentium G3450 2 / 2 3400 - 3 MB HD (Haswell) 53 $86
Core i3-4150 2 / 4 3500 - 3 MB HD 4400 54 $117
Core i3-4150T 2 / 4 3000 - 3 MB HD 4400 35 $117
Core i3-4350 2 / 4 3600 - 4 MB HD 4600 54 $138
Core i3-4350T 2 / 4 3100 - 4 MB HD 4600 35 $138
Core i3-4360 2 / 4 3700 - 4 MB HD 4600 54 $149
Core i5-4460 4 / 4 3200 3400 6 MB HD 4600 84 $182
Core i5-4460S 4 / 4 2900 - 6 MB HD 4600 65 $182
Core i5-4590 4 / 4 3300 3700 6 MB HD 4600 84 $192
Core i5-4590S 4 / 4 3000 3700 6 MB HD 4600 65 $192
Core i5-4590T 4 / 4 2000 - 6 MB HD 4600 35 $192
Core i5-4690 4 / 4 3500 3900 6 MB HD 4600 84 $213
Core i5-4690S 4 / 4 3200 3900 6 MB HD 4600 65 $213
Core i5-4690T 4 / 4 2500 - 6 MB HD 4600 45 $213
Core i7-4785T 4 / 8 2200 - 8 MB HD 4600 35 $303
Core i7-4790 4 / 8 3600 4000 8 MB HD 4600 84 $303
Core i7-4790S 4 / 8 3200 4000 8 MB HD 4600 65 $303
Core i7-4790T 4 / 8 2700 - 8 MB HD 4600 45 $303

 

 

 데스크탑용 하스웰 리프레시 프로세서 라인업, 가격대를 보면 기존 구형 하스웰과 동일하게 형성

 

 

 

Haswell Celeron
  Celeron G1840
2.8 GHz 
(New)
Celeron G1830
2.8 GHz 
(Current)
CPU Speed 2.8 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 2 2
L2 Cache 512 KB 512 KB
L3 Cache 2048 KB 2048 KB
IGP HD (Haswell) HD (Haswell)
IGP Frequency ? 1050
TDP 53W 53W
Price at Launch $42 $52

 

 

신형 하스웰 셀러론 - 성능을 유지한 채 가격 다운 

 

Haswell Core i7
  Core i7-4790
(New)
Core i7-4771
(Current)
CPU Speed 3600 MHz / 4000 MHz 3500 MHz / 3900 MHz
Cores 4 4
Threads 8 8
L2 Cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
L3 Cache 8192 KB 8192 KB
IGP HD 4600 HD 4600
IGP Frequency 350 / 1200 MHz 350 MHz / 1200 MHz
TDP 84W 84W
Price at Launch $303 $314 (OEM) / $320 (box)

 

 

신형 하스웰 리프레시 Core i7 4790은 기존 정보대로 기본클럭과 부스트 클럭이 각각 100MHz 씩 상승했고, 가격은 오히려 감소 / 공격적인 가격 정책 확인 / 하스웰 수율 안정화

 

The Intel Haswell Refresh Review
  Core i7-4790
(New)
Core i7-4770K Core i7-4765T Core i5-4690
(New)
Core i3-4360
(New)
Core i3-4330
Price $303 $340 $303 $225 $149 $140
Launch 5/2014 6/2013 6/2013 5/2014 5/2014 9/2013
Cores / Threads 4/8 4/8 4/8 4/4 2/4 2/4
Base
Frequency
3600 3500 2000 3500 3700 3500
Turbo
Frequency
4000 3900 3000 3900 - -
IGP HD 4600 HD 4600 HD 4600 HD 4600 HD 4600 HD 4600
IGP
Frequency
350 350 350 350 600 350
IGP Turbo 1200 1250 1200 1200 1200 1150
L3 Cache 8 MB 8 MB 8 MB 6 MB 4 MB 4 MB
TDP 84 W 84 W 35 W 84 W 54 W 54 W

 

 

테스트가 진행된 신형 하스웰 리프레시 4790 / 4690 / 4360 스펙, 각각 동작 클럭 증가

 

 

[ 테스트 시스템 ]

 

Test Setup
Processor Intel Core i7-4790 ES (4C/8T, 3.6 GHz to 4.0 GHz)
Intel Core i5-4690 ES (4C/4T, 3.5 GHz to 3.9 GHz)
Intel Core i3-4360 ES (2C/4T, 3.7 GHz)
Motherboards ASRock Z97 Extreme6
ASUS Z97-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H80i
Thermaltake TRUE Copper
Power Supply OCZ 1250W Gold ZX Series
Corsair AX1200i Platinum PSU
Memory G.Skill RipjawsZ 4x4 GB DDR3-1866 8-9-9 Kit
ADATA XPG 2x8 GB DDR3L-1600 9-11-9 Kit
Memory Settings 1600 9-11-9-27 1T tRFC 240
Video Cards MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB (1150/1202 Boost)
ASUS HD7970 3GB (Reference)
Video Drivers Catalyst 13.12 WHQL
NVIDIA Drivers 335.23 WHQL
Hard Drive OCZ Vertex 3 256GB
Optical Drive LG GH22NS50
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit SP1

 

 

 

Power Consumption - Long Idle  (GTX 770 Installed)

Power Consumption - Idle (GTX 770 Installed)

Power Consumption - OCCT  (GTX 770 Installed)

 

전력소모 테스트 : 아이들시 1와트 내외의 차이 / 풀로드시 3~5와트 편차

 

 

 Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Total Time

 

 

WinRAR 5.01

 

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

 

Xilisoft VC 7.5 Film CPU Only

Xilisoft VC 7.5 2x4K

 

 

HandBrake v0.9.9 Film

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K

 

클럭이 상승된 만큼 기존 하스웰 대비 성능 향상

 

 

SYSmark 2014 Overall

SYSmark 2014 Office Productivity

SYSmark 2014 Media Creation

SYSmark 2014 Data and Financial Analysis

 

 

역시 성능 향상

 

 

older results we keep the version 10 results in our database.

Cinebench R10, Single Thread

Cinebench R10, MultiThread

Cinebench R11.5, Single Thread

Cinebench R11.5, MultiThread

Cinebench R15, Single Thread

Cinebench R15, MultiThread

Video Conversion - x264 HD 3.03 Benchmark

Graysky's x264 HD test uses x264 to encode a 4Mbps 720p MPEG-2 source. The focus here is on quality rather than speed, thus the benchmark uses a 2-pass encode and reports the average frame rate in each pass.

x264 HD v3.03, 1st Pass

x264 HD v3.03, 2nd Pass

Encryption TrueCrypt v0.7.1a: link

TrueCrypt is an off the shelf open source encryption tool for xe/files and folders. For our test we run the benchmark mode using a 1GB buffer and take the mean result from AES encryption.

TrueCrypt 7.1a AES

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of xe/files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-Zip MIPS

Rendering – PovRay 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision RayTracer, or PovRay, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.

PovRay 3.7 beta

 

 전체적으로 모두 성능 향상

 

 

 Dolphin Benchmark

 

 

 

SunSpider 1.0.2: link

SunSpider 1.0.2

Mozilla Kraken 1.1: link

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

PT WebXPRT 2013: link

WebXPRT

Google Octane 2: link

Google Octane v2

 

 전체적으로 클럭 상승 만큰 모든 부분 성능 향상

 

 

이하 내장 그래픽 성능

 

F1 2013

F1 2013: Performance

F1 2013: Performance

The HD 4600 at 1200 MHz falls just short of 60 FPS average on F1 2013, and moving up from the i3 seems to offer a 6% increase in minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite: Performance

Bioshock Infinite: Performance

Bioshock Infinite seems memory bound a little, given how good Iris Pro is compared to the HD 4600 scores. There is almost a 10% jump from i3 to i5 here on average FPS and almost 20% in minimum FPS.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider: Performance

Tomb Raider: Performance

Tomb Raider with discrete GPUs is characteristally CPU agnostic, however moving from an i3 to an i5 gives and extra 5.5 FPS on average in our test.

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs: Performance

Sleeping Dogs: Performance

Company of Heroes 2

Company of Heroes 2: Performance

Company of Heroes 2: Performance

 

내장 그래픽 성능은 전반적으로 AMD가 우세하나 인텔의 아이리스 프로 내장 그래픽은 막강

 

 

3DMark

The synthetic tools from Futuremark have been on the benchmarking landscape for over a decade, with each generation designed to tackle new problems as either the CPUs or GPUs become too powerful. Here we test 3DMark 06, 3DMark 11 (Performance) and the latest 3DMark.

3DMark06

3DMark11 - Performance

3DMark: Ice Storm

3DMark: Ice Storm Extreme

3DMark: Ice Storm Unlimited

3DMark: Cloud Gate

3DMark: Fire Strike

3DMark: Fire Strike Extreme

 

 

일반적인 내장 그래픽 성능은 AMD 가 우세

 

 

 

dGPU Benchmarks: 1x MSI GTX770 Lightning

F1 2013

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Using the i3 brings the frame rate down below 120 FPS average, with the minimum FPS up to 20% lower than the i5.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

With Bioshock on single NVIDIA, it would seem that CPU power matters more in the minimum FPS values.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Tomb Raider is infamously CPU-agnostic, showing all CPUs hovering around or below 50 FPS average.

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Similarly with Sleeping Dogs, it does not take much CPU power to hit peak FPS.

Company of Heroes 2

Company Of Heroes 2: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Company Of Heroes 2: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

COH2 takes a strain on most graphics cards, but both average and minimum FPS are roughly the same for all three refresh CPUs.

Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

 

 외장 그래픽(지포스 770) 탑재 비교시 인텔의 독무대

 

 

 

dGPU Benchmarks: 1x ASUS HD7970

F1 2013

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

With a single 7970, the 25% minimum frame-rate difference between an i3 and an i5 is almost astonishing.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Company of Heroes 2

Company Of Heroes 2: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Company Of Heroes 2: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 1x HD 7970

 

 외장 그래픽(라데온 7970) 탑재 비교시 같은 결과로 인텔

 

출처 -  http://www.anandtech.com

 

하스웰 리프레시는 기존 하스웰 대비 성능 향상, 가격은 비슷하거나 저렴






Articles

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13