' alt='위대한 인류최대 수퍼로켓 '스타십(Spacex Starship)' 발사 성공 by 인공지능' />
![삼성, 잃어버린 10년 [풀영상] | 창 458회 (KBS 24.03.12) by 인공지능](https://raptor-hw.net/xe/files/thumbnails/453/204/271x205.crop.jpg "삼성, 잃어버린 10년 [풀영상] | 창 458회 (KBS 24.03.12)<br>")
엔비디아가 발표한 파스칼 기반 플래그십 GPU 타이탄X 벤치마크 자료입니다.
| Titan X (Pascal) | GTX 1080 | GTX 980 Ti | TITAN X | GTX 980 | R9 Fury X | R9 Fury | R9 Nano | R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU | GP102 | GP104 | GM200 | GM200 | GM204 | Fiji XT | Fiji Pro | Fiji XT | Hawaii XT |
| GPU Cores | 3584 | 2560 | 2816 | 3072 | 2048 | 4096 | 3584 | 4096 | 2816 |
| Rated Clock | 1417 MHz | 1607 MHz | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz | 1126 MHz | 1050 MHz | 1000 MHz | up to 1000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Texture Units | 224 | 160 | 176 | 192 | 128 | 256 | 224 | 256 | 176 |
| ROP Units | 96 | 64 | 96 | 96 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 |
| Memory | 12GB | 8GB | 6GB | 12GB | 4GB | 4GB | 4GB | 4GB | 8GB |
| Memory Clock | 10000 MHz | 10000 MHz | 7000 MHz | 7000 MHz | 7000 MHz | 500 MHz | 500 MHz | 500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 384-bit G5X | 256-bit G5X | 384-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit | 4096-bit (HBM) | 4096-bit (HBM) | 4096-bit (HBM) | 512-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 320 GB/s | 336 GB/s | 336 GB/s | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| TDP | 250 watts | 180 watts | 250 watts | 250 watts | 165 watts | 275 watts | 275 watts | 175 watts | 275 watts |
| Peak Compute | 11.0 TFLOPS | 8.2 TFLOPS | 5.63 TFLOPS | 6.14 TFLOPS | 4.61 TFLOPS | 8.60 TFLOPS | 7.20 TFLOPS | 8.19 TFLOPS | 5.63 TFLOPS |
| Transistor Count | 11.0B | 7.2B | 8.0B | 8.0B | 5.2B | 8.9B | 8.9B | 8.9B | 6.2B |
| Process Tech | 16nm | 16nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm |
| MSRP (current) | $1,200 | $599 | $649 | $999 | $499 | $649 | $549 | $499 | $329 |
엔비디아와 AMD의 하이엔드 GPU 라인업의 스펙 및 가격비교표 입니다.
파스칼 타이탄X는 3584개의 쿠다코어와 224개의 텍스처 유닛, 96개의 ROP 유닛으로 구성됩니다. 비디오 메모리는 12GB, 메모리 인터페이스는 384-bit, TDP는 250watts, TSMC 16나노 공정으로 제조되며 가격은 1200달러 입니다.
타이탄X는 GP102 GPU 코어로 구성됩니다.
파스칼 타이탄X의 외형입니다. 엔비디아 특유의 디자인이 적용되었으며 인터페이스는 풀 사이즈 DisplayPort 커넥터가 3개, HDMI 2.0a 포트가 1개, dual-link DVI 포트 1개로 구성됩니다. 또한 보조 전원은 8+6핀 구조이며 강력한 SLI 구성도 지원됩니다.
다음은 테스트 시스템과 본격적인 게이밍 벤치마크 입니다.
| PC Perspective GPU Testbed | |
|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E |
| Motherboard | ASUS Rampage V Extreme X99 |
| Memory | G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB DDR4-3200 |
| Storage | OCZ Agility 4 256GB (OS) Adata SP610 500GB (games) |
| Power Supply | Corsair AX1500i 1500 watt |
| OS | Windows 10 x64 |
| Drivers | AMD: 16.7.2 NVIDIA: 368.98 |
파스탈 타이탄X의 GPU-Z 입니다. 베이스 클럭 1418MHz, 부스트 클럭 1531MHz가 확인되고 있습니다.
게이밍 성능테스트가 시작됩니다.
The PCPER FRAPS File
Previous example data
While the graphs above are produced by the default version of the scripts from NVIDIA, I have modified and added to them in a few ways to produce additional data for our readers. The first file shows a sub-set of the data from the RUN file above, the average frame rate over time as defined by FRAPS, though we are combining all of the GPUs we are comparing into a single graph. This will basically emulate the data we have been showing you for the past several years.
The PCPER Observed FPS File
Previous example data
This graph takes a different subset of data points and plots them similarly to the FRAPS file above, but this time we are look at the “observed” average frame rates, shown previously as the blue bars in the RUN file above. This takes out the dropped and runts frames, giving you the performance metrics that actually matter – how many frames are being shown to the gamer to improve the animation sequences.
As you’ll see in our full results on the coming pages, seeing a big difference between the FRAPS FPS graphic and the Observed FPS will indicate cases where it is likely the gamer is not getting the full benefit of the hardware investment in their PC.
The PLOT File
Previous example data
Previous example data
For tests that show no runts or drops, the data is pretty clean. This is the standard frame rate per second over a span of time graph that has become the standard for performance evaluation on graphics cards.
Previous example data
A test that does have runts and drops will look much different. The black bar labeled FRAPS indicates the average frame rate over time that traditional testing would show if you counted the drops and runts in the equation – as FRAPS FPS measurement does. Any area in red is a dropped frame – the wider the amount of red you see, the more colored bars from our overlay were missing in the captured video file, indicating the gamer never saw those frames in any form.
The wide yellow area is the representation of runts, the thin bands of color in our captured video, that we have determined do not add to the animation of the image on the screen. The larger the area of yellow the more often those runts are appearing.
Finally, the blue line is the measured FPS over each second after removing the runts and drops. We are going to be calling this metric the “observed frame rate” as it measures the actual speed of the animation that the gamer experiences.
The PERcentile File
Previous example data
Previous example data
| NVIDIA Titan X (Pascal) 12GB, Average FPS Comparisons, Dirt Rally | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1080 | GTX 980 Ti | Fury X | GTX 980 SLI | ||
| 2560x1440 | +41% | +72% | +76% | +35% | |
| 3840x2160 | +42% | +73% | +70% | +37% | |
파스칼 타이탄X는 더트랠리 테스트에서 4K 기준 지포스 1080 대비 42%, 980TI 대비 73%, 라데온 퓨리X 대비 70% 높은 성능으로 압도적인 성능을 나타내고 있습니다.
Fallout 4 doesn't see as dramatic of a performance delta at 2560x1440 as we saw in Dirt Rally, but the gap is still impressive. While the GTX 1080 averages less than 100 FPS, the Titan X pushes out 120+ FPS!
When running at 4K, a similar percentage improvement gets us over 60 FPS for the majority of our test run, better than both the GTX 1080 and the Fury X.
| NVIDIA Titan X (Pascal) 12GB, Average FPS Comparisons, Fallout 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1080 | GTX 980 Ti | Fury X | GTX 980 SLI | ||
| 2560x1440 | +25% | +51% | +73% | +12% | |
| 3840x2160 | +39% | +68% | +82% | +19% | |
파스칼 타이탄X는 폴아웃4 테스트에서 4K 기준 지포스 1080 대비 39%, 980TI 대비 68%, 라데온 퓨리X 대비 82% 높은 성능으로 압도적인 성능을 나타내고 있습니다.
At 2560x1440, the new Titan X is not any faster than the GTX 980 SLI configuration or the GeForce GTX 1080. It seems the game is CPU limited in this instance.
That definitely gets addressed at 4K - the new Titan X has room to spread its wings and pull away from the pair of GTX 980 cards in SLI as well as the GTX 1080!
| NVIDIA Titan X (Pascal) 12GB, Average FPS Comparisons, Grand Theft Auto V | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1080 | GTX 980 Ti | Fury X | GTX 980 SLI | ||
| 2560x1440 | +4% | +30% | +74% | +4% | |
| 3840x2160 | +34% | +73% | +102% | +21% | |
This table presents the above data in a more basic way, focusing only on the average FPS, so keep that in mind.
파스칼 타이탄X는 그랜드 테프트 오토5 테스트에서 4K 기준 지포스 1080 대비 34%, 980TI 대비 73%, 라데온 퓨리X 대비 102% 높은 성능으로 압도적인 성능을 나타내고 있습니다.
One of the "feathers" in the cap for AMD at the mainstream price point, Hitman running in DX12 mode runs nearly perfectly on the Titan X. Performance tops out over 100 FPS on average, beating out the GTX 1080 by 17% and the AMD Fury X by 37%. Compared to previous games, the Fury X is definitely more competitive, an indication that the DX12 performance advantages are at least helping.
At 4K things separate a bit; the Titan X is 25% faster than the GTX 1080 and 65% faster than the Fury X.
| NVIDIA Titan X (Pascal) 12GB, Average FPS Comparisons, Hitman (2016) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX 1080 | GTX 980 Ti | Fury X | GTX 980 SLI | ||
| 2560x1440 | +17% | +66% | +37% | +110% | |
| 3840x2160 | +25% | +70% | +65% | +159% | |
This table presents the above data in a more basic way, focusing only on the average FPS, so keep that in mind.
파스칼 타이탄X는 히트맨 테스트에서 4K 기준 지포스 1080 대비 25%, 980TI 대비 70%, 라데온 퓨리X 대비 65% 높은 성능으로 압도적인 성능을 나타내고 있습니다.
In the Witcher 3, the Titan X is using as much power as the GTX 980 Ti in the early portion of our test run, and as much as the AMD Fury X on the later half. The waves still exist, but they don't seem to indicate any specific power issues. There are a couple of brief instances where the power draw is just over 250 watts.
How does the power distribution break down between the motherboard slot and 8-pin/6-pin power connection with the new Titan X?
파스칼 타이탄X의 전력소모는 압도적인 성능에도 불구하고 지포스 980TI 급의 전력소모를 나타냅니다.
출처 - http://www.pcper.com
결론 : 엔비디아 파스칼 타이탄X는 지포스 1080도 관광시키는 세계정복 카드입니다.
