지스킬의 고성능 PCIe 인터페이스 SSD 피닉스 블레이드
| G.Skill Phoenix Blade Specifications | |
| Capacity | 480GB |
| Form Factor | Half-Height, Half-Length (HHHL) |
| Interface | PCI Express 2.0 x8 |
| RAID Controller | SBC 208-2 |
| NAND Controller | 4x SandForce SF-2282 |
| NAND | Toshiba 64Gbit 19nm MLC |
| Sequential Read | Up to 2000MB/s |
| Sequential Write | Up to 2000MB/s |
| 4KB Random Read | Up to 90K IOPS |
| 4KB Random Write | Up to 245K IOPS |
| Power Consumption | 8W (idle) / 18W (max) |
| Encryption | AES-128 |
| Endurance | 1536TB (~1.4TB per day) |
| Warranty | Three years |
피닉스 블레이드 스펙.
1.폼팩터 : Half-Height, Half-Length (HHHL)
2.인터페이스 : PCI Express 2.0 x8
3.레이드 컨트롤러 : SBC 208-2
4.낸드 컨트롤러 : SandForce SF-2282 4개
5.낸드 플래시 : Toshiba 64Gbit 19nm MLC
6.시퀀셜 읽기 성능 : 2000MB/s
7.시퀀셜 쓰기 성능 : 2000MB/s
8.4KB 랜덤 읽기 : 90K IOPS
9.4KB 랜덤 쓰기 : 245K IOPS
10.전력소모 : 아이들 8와트 / 로드 18와트
11.암호화 : AES-128
12.워런티 : 3년
기판 전체 히트싱크
메인기판 + 확장 기판 도시바 낸드 플래시 및 SF-2281 컨트롤러 탑재
The RAID controller in the Phoenix Blade is a complete mystery
SBC 208-2 레이드 컨트롤러는 미스테리?
새로운 B2 스테핑의 SF-2281 컨트롤러
Test System
| CPU | Intel Core i5-2500K running at 3.3GHz (Turbo & EIST enabled) |
| Motherboard | ASRock Z68 Pro3 |
| Chipset | Intel Z68 |
| Chipset Drivers | Intel 9.1.1.1015 + Intel RST 10.2 |
| Memory | G.Skill RipjawsX DDR3-1600 4 x 8GB (9-9-9-24) |
| Video Card | Palit GeForce GTX 770 JetStream 2GB GDDR5 (1150MHz core clock; 3505MHz GDDR5 effective) |
| Video Drivers | NVIDIA GeForce 332.21 WHQL |
| Desktop Resolution | 1920 x 1080 |
| OS | Windows 7 x64 |
Quite surprisingly, the Phoenix Blade takes the lead in our 2013 Storage Bench and even beats the XP941. After reviewing the RevoDrive 350, I didn't get my hopes up for the Phoenix Blade, but it looks like G.Skill has done a much better job at optimizing the drive for performance.
어낸드텍 스토리지 벤치 2013 - 최고 성능
The Phoenix Blade continues to be strong in our 2011 Storage Benches, although the XP941 retrieves its crown as the fastest client drive. I'm guessing the XP941 is more optimized for typical client workloads, which the 2011 suites present, whereas the 2013 workload is much, much heavier and only applies to users with very heavy IO workload.
어낸드텍 스토리지 벤치 2011 - 삼성 XP941 PCIE SSD에 이어 두번째 성능
Random read speed is typical SandForce, which makes sense because the performance doesn't scale across multiple controllers at such low queue depths (QD=3 in this case).
4KB 랜덤 읽기/쓰기 - 중하급 성능
4KB 랜덤 쓰기(QD32) - 최고 성능
Sequential performance is also excellent, although the XP941 enjoys a slight advantage in sequential read performance. Overall the Phoenix Blade seems to be well optimized for parallelism -- much better than the RevoDrive 350 -- as it's able to provide substantially higher performance than SATA drives.
<데스크탑 아이오메터>
시퀀셜 읽기 - 삼성 XP941 PCIE SSD에 이어 두번째 성능
시퀀셜 쓰기 - 최고 성능
AS-SSD 시퀀셜 읽기/쓰기 성능 - 최고 성능
Click for full size
