랩터 인터내셔널에 오신걸 환영 합니다
>

logo

  • head
  • news
  • product
  • mobile
  • benchmark
  • analysis
  • computing
  • multimedia

S10_678x452.jpg


삼성 갤럭시S10 스마트폰에 탑재되는 엑시노스 9820과 스냅드래곤 855에 대한 성능 비교


PCMark Work 2.0 - Web Browsing 2.0PCMark Work 2.0 - Web Browsing 2.0

In PCMark’s Web Browsing test, the new Galaxy S10s both perform well. What is interesting to see here is that compared to the scores we initially ran on Qualcomm’s reference device back in January, the Snapdragon 855 Galaxy S10 represents a notable uplift, and seems to be a better representation of the capability of the chip compared to the QRD.

It’s to be noted that the comparisons I’m making today are all on the new Android 9 firmwares – I don’t have updated figures for the Exynos S9 or the Snapdragon Note9, but have the latest numbers on the Snapdragon S9 and Exynos Note9, which should be identical to their sister series' counter-parts.

The new Exynos 9820 Galaxy S10 now showcases a large performance upgrade compared to last year’s Exynos 9810 units. The new chip’s figures are good and better than the Snapdragon 845, however aren’t able to match either the Snapdragon 855 nor the HiSilicon Kirin 980 – the latter two both based on Arm’s newest Cortex A76 CPU cores.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Video EditingPCMark Work 2.0 - Video Editing

The video editing test is less relevant nowadays as performance differences between different platforms are quite minor. Still the new Exynos still shows a distinct performance difference to the Snapdragon counter-part, similar to what we saw last year.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Writing 2.0PCMark Work 2.0 - Writing 2.0

The writing test is probably the single most important component of PCMark when it comes to representing the experienced performance of a device. The Snapdragon 855 Galaxy S10 falls in line with the QRD’s performance, which is excellent.

The new Exynos 9820 Galaxy S10 represents a major jump for Samsung, scoring double what we’ve seen on the Exynos 9810 units last year. Likely what this means is that Samsung has solved some of the most important performance issues plaguing the Exynos S9/Note9. The phone still lags behind the new Snapdragon 855 as well as the Kirin 980. We’re not sure if this continued difference is due to hardware or scheduler, and we won’t be able to find out until a more in-depth investigation at a later date.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Photo Editing 2.0PCMark Work 2.0 - Photo Editing 2.0

In the Photo Editing test we see the new Exynos 9820 similarly performing almost twice as well as last year’s Samsung silicon. Here it’s clearer that the difference is due to new improved scheduler reactivity as the workload isn’t necessarily throughput limited. The continued performance detriment to the Snapdragon and Kirin chipsets however still points our that Samsung’s APIs still aren’t as well optimised.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Data ManipulationPCMark Work 2.0 - Data Manipulation

Finally, the Data Manipulation score is more single-thread limited workload. Here, the new Snapdragon 855 Galaxy S10 takes the top spot among devices. The new Exynos 9820 doesn’t fall too far behind, and does represent a big boost over the Galaxy S9 in either versions.

Speedometer 2.0 - OS WebViewSpeedometer 2.0 - OS WebView

Switching over to a browser benchmark, the new Galaxy S10s both perform almost identically. The performance of the Snapdragon 855 is a bit better than the QRD we tested in January, however it’s still lagging behind the Kirin 980.

The Exynos 9820’s performance here represents a huge boost compared to the Exynos 9810. The score presented here not only represents the possibly much better scheduler, but also hardware improvements on the part of the new cluster and microarchitecture designs.

Performance looks “OK” for the Exynos – Though Snapdragon looks to be leading

Overall the new Galaxy S10s are both in line with expectations. The Snapdragon 855 Galaxy S10’s performance isn’t much of a surprise, as we had covered the chipset in detail at Qualcomm’s performance preview event. The Galaxy S10 actually performs better than the QRD – putting to rest some of the worries we had on the early platform. It’s to be noted that Qualcomm here still lags a tad behind HiSilicon’s Kirin 980 in some aspects, probably a result of the latter’s better memory latency.

The new Exynos 9820 performs significantly better than last year’s 9810. Here Samsung seems to have taken note of the scheduler slowness that has plagued the last 3 generations of Samsung SoCs. Besides some obvious software improvements, the new M4 microarchitecture also seems to have upped the performance. Samsung claims 20% better performance than the 9810, which looks to be reasonable.

Battery Life To Be Determined

Today’s results only represent a bare minimum in terms of benchmarking Samsung’s new devices. While the new Exynos 9820 can’t keep up to the Snapdragon 855 in terms of performance, it’s no longer such a stark difference as we saw last year.

Most importantly, there’s still one big open question: power efficiency. As we’ve covered in our preview of the Snapdragon 855, the new Cortex A76 derived cores on a new 7nm process node showcase some outstanding efficiency figures. HiSilicon’s Kirin 980 is able to power some of highest endurance flagship devices today, and I expect the Snapdragon 855 to be able to achieve the same. If the new Exynos is able to achieve the same is something we’ll have to find out at a later date. We have to remember that Samsung’s chipset not only has to fix its microarchitectural efficiency issues, but also comes with a process manufacturing disadvantage as the chip is produced on a (theoretically) inferior 8nm process.

Unfortunately we won’t have the Galaxy S10 in-house for review until after public availability on March 8th – so we’ll have to be a little more patient before we can post a more detailed analysis of Samsung’s new flagship devices.


출처 - https://www.anandtech.com


결론 : 스냅드래곤 855가 엑시노스 9820 보다 성능이 훨씬 뛰어남

  • profile
    RAPTER_INTERNATIONAL 2019.03.01 13:38
    I hope you are always happy
  • ?
    성균관대 2019.03.01 13:43
    엑시노스를 보면 AMD가 떠오르는 이유는 뭘까요
  • profile
    CCIE 2019.03.01 18:02
    9820은 화웨이 기린한테도 졌네요
  • profile
    코어m 2019.03.02 09:58
    삼성은 경쟁력이 상실된 사업부는 가차없이 내치기로 유명한데, 몇 년전부터 저건 왜 나두고 있을까여,,, 엑시노스는 내부거래 빼면 고객도 없을텐데






  1. 현존 게이밍 지존 승부) 인텔 9600K vs 9700K vs 9900k 인 게임 테스트

    Games : Metro Exodus Battlefield 5 - 01:16 Assassin's Creed Odyssey - 02:30 HITMAN 2 - 03:43 Forza Horizon 4 - 05:27 Far Cry New Dawn - 06:31 Grand Theft Auto V - 07:40 The Witcher 3 - 09:16 System: Windows 10 Pro Intel i5 9600k 5.0Ghz...
    Date2019.08.04 CategoryGPU Reply1 Views641
    Read More
  2. Ryzen 7 3700x vs i7 9700k Test in 10 Games

    Games : Assassin's Creed Odyssey Project Cars - 01:10 Battlefield 5 - 02:27 Rainbow Six Siege - 03:37 The Witcher 3 - 04:27 Metro Exodus - 05:38 Grand Theft Auto V - 06:43 HITMAN 2 - 08:04 The Division 2 - 09:09 Watch Dogs 2 - 10:05 Syst...
    Date2019.07.21 CategoryCPU Reply1 Views835
    Read More
  3. RX 5700 XT vs RTX 2070 SUPER vs RTX 2080 Test in 9 Games

    RADEON RX 5700 XT vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs RTX 2080 (i9 9900k) World of Warships - https://wgaffiliate.com/?a=2736&c=469... Games : Assassin's Creed Odyssey Battlefield 5 - 01:00 Kingdom Come Deliverance - 02:22 Metro Exodus - 03...
    Date2019.07.21 CategoryGPU Reply0 Views559
    Read More
  4. AMD 라이젠 3600 VS 인텔 9600K 성능 승부

    라이젠 3600 과 인텔 9600K 의 기본 벤치 및 게임성능을 비교 테스트 해봤습니다. 라이젠 3600의 경우 아직까지 바이오스 부분과 안정화 그리고 게임의 경우 최적화 부분에서 약간 문제가 있는것 같습니다. How does AMD’s new Ryzen 5 3600 CPU co...
    Date2019.07.21 CategoryCPU Reply3 Views1318
    Read More
  5. AMD 라이젠9 3900X vs 인텔 Core i9-9900K 게임 성능 대결

    Intel Core i9-9900KAMD Ryzen 9 3900XArchitectureCoffee LakeZen 2Socket1151AM4Cores / Threads8 / 16 12 / 24 Base Frequency (GHz)3.63.8Boost Frequency (Active Cores - GHz)1/2 Cores - 5.0 3/4 Cores - 4.8 5-8 Cores - 4.7 4.6 (1 Core)L3 Ca...
    Date2019.07.13 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views959
    Read More
  6. AMD 라데온RX 5700XT, RX 5700 벤치마크 (NAVI)

    AMD 라데온RX 5700XT AMD 라데온RX 5700 00 finds itself going up against GeForce RTX 2060. Radeon RX 5700 XT GeForce RTX 2060 Super Radeon RX 5700 GeForce RTX 2060 FE Architecture (GPU) RDNA (Navi 10) T...
    Date2019.07.13 CategoryGPU Reply0 Views585
    Read More
  7. 공식) AMD 신형 3700X, 3900X vs 인텔 9900K, 9700K 승부

    AMD가 3세대 라이젠(젠2) 아키텍처 기반의 3700X, 3900X 를 공식 발표했다. 먼저 3700X는 8코어 16스레드, 베이스 3.6, 부스트 4.4의 동작 클럭과 32MB L3 캐시, TDP 65와트의 스펙으로 가격은 329달러 3900X는 12코어 24스레드, 베이스 3.8, ...
    Date2019.07.07 CategoryCPU Reply6 Views1352
    Read More
  8. 엔비디아 지포스RTX 2070 Super & RTX 2060 Super 리뷰

    엔비디아가 AMD의 라데온 RX 5700 시리즈를 견제하기 위해 기존 RTX 시리즈에 "수퍼(SUPER)"로 명명한 신규 제품을 출시했다. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20 Series LineupCardPriceGeForce RTX 2080 TiMSRP: $999 Street Price: $1249GeForce RTX 2080 Super...
    Date2019.07.07 CategoryGPU Reply2 Views1073
    Read More
  9. 삼성 갤럭시 폴드 리뷰 : 더 버지 / 월 스트리트 저널 / CNBC

    삼성전자는 4월 26일 스크린 문제에 대한 보도에도 불구하고 여전히 갤럭시 폴드(Galaxy Fold)를 출시하고 있습니다. 이러한 문제에도 불구하고 우리의 리뷰는 가장 중요한 질문에 답합니다 : 스크린, 카메라, 성능 및 소프트웨어 경험이 멈추었습니까? ...
    Date2019.04.21 CategoryETC Reply5 Views3117
    Read More
  10. 삼성 갤럭시S10 : 엑시노스 9820 vs 스냅드래곤 855 승부

    삼성 갤럭시S10 스마트폰에 탑재되는 엑시노스 9820과 스냅드래곤 855에 대한 성능 비교 In PCMark’s Web Browsing test, the new Galaxy S10s both perform well. What is interesting to see here is that compared to the scores we initially ran o...
    Date2019.03.01 CategoryCPU Reply4 Views1267
    Read More
  11. Nvidia 지포스GTX 1660 Ti 6GB 리뷰 : Turing Without The RTX

    EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC Black Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 FE GeForce GTX 1060 FE GeForce GTX 1070 FE Architecture (GPU) Turing (TU116) Turing (TU106)Pascal (GP106)Pascal (GP104) CUDA Cores 1536 1920 1280 1920 Peak FP32 Compute 5.4...
    Date2019.02.26 CategoryGPU Reply2 Views1653
    Read More
  12. AMD 라데온7 16GB 리뷰, 절망의 라데온 (Radeon VII)

    AMD의 신형 라데온7이 마침내 발매 되었습니다. 라데온7은 GPU 측면으로 종합 16GB HBM2 메모리가 장착되어 있습니다. 라데온7의 GPGPU 연산 성능은 FP16과 FP32 모두 RTX 2080보다 떨어지며 FP64는 앞섭니다. ...
    Date2019.02.08 CategoryGPU Reply4 Views1751
    Read More
  13. 엔비디아 지포스RTX 2060 6G 파운더스 에디션 리뷰

    엔비디아의 차세대 "튜링 아키텍처" 적용, RTX 2080TI - 2080 - 2070에 이은 RTX 2060 파운더스 에디션 리뷰 RTX 2060은 1920 쿠다코어, 48ROPs, 베이스 클럭 1365MHz, 부스트 클럭 1680MHz, 메모리 클럭은 GDDR6 14Gbps, 192비트 메...
    Date2019.01.13 CategoryGPU Reply3 Views2769
    Read More
  14. Intel Core i9-9980XE CPU 리뷰, 18코어 36스레드 성능은?

    Intel Core i9-9980XE Specifications Socket LGA 2066 Cores / Threads 18 / 36 TDP 165W Base Frequency 3.0 GHz Turbo Frequency (2.0 / 3.0) 4.4 / 4.5 GHz L3 Cache 24.75MB Integrated Graphics No Graphics Base/Turbo (MHz) N/A Memory Suppo...
    Date2019.01.13 CategoryCPU Reply0 Views1570
    Read More
  15. 인텔 순정 i5 8400 vs. AMD 오버클럭 Ryzen 5 2600X OC 승부

    테스트 시스템 [ 인텔 시스템 ] ○ CPU: Intel Core i5-8400 3.8GHz, Hexa Core / Coffee Lake ○ Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H55 ○ GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X 11G ○ Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON ○ PSU: MODECOM VOLCANO 750W 1...
    Date2019.01.12 CategoryCPU Reply2 Views1193
    Read More
  16. AMD RADEON RX 590 벤치마크 - RX 580 오버클럭 버전

    AMD가 새로 발표한 라데온 RX 590 성능 벤치마크 라데온 VS 지포스 스펙 비교표 Test SystemTest System - VGA Rev. 2018.2Processor:Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.8 GHz (Coffee Lake, 12 MB Cache)Moth...
    Date2018.11.17 CategoryGPU Reply2 Views1714
    Read More
  17. Battlefield V Benchmark Performance Analysis (GPU 벤치마크)

    해외 www.techpowerup.com 사이트에서 진행한 Battlefield V GPU 벤치마크. 현행 GPU 성능 분석 참고 자료 Test SystemTest SystemProcessor:Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.8 GHz (Coffee Lake, 12 MB Cache)Motherboard:ASUS Maximus X Code Intel ...
    Date2018.11.11 CategoryGPU Reply0 Views1239
    Read More
  18. 인텔 Core i9-9900K, Core i7-9700K, Core i5-9600K 공식 벤치마크

    인텔의 최신 9세대 프로세서 Core i9-9900K, Core i7-9700K, Core i5-9600K CPU 벤치마크 입니다. 자료 출처 - https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i9-9900k-9th-gen-cpu,5847.html Core i9-9900K Core i7-9700K Core i5-...
    Date2018.10.20 CategoryCPU Reply4 Views4513
    Read More
  19. 아이폰 XS 벤치마크 성능 테스트 : 더 빠르고 오래 가는 아이폰

    Jason Cross | Macworld 아이폰 X과 아이폰 8에 사용된 A11 바이오닉 프로세서는 두 기종을 2017년 가장 강력한 스마트폰의 자리에 올려 놓았다. 안드로이드와 iOS 디바이스의 성능을 직접적으로 비교하기란 어렵지만, 확실한 것은 현재 안드로이드 폰 중 ...
    Date2018.09.28 CategoryETC Reply0 Views1179
    Read More
  20. 애플 iPhone XS Max, iPhone XS vs 삼성 갤럭시 노트9 성능 대결

    iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max Specs iPhone XSiPhone XS MaxStarting Price$999$1,099ProcessorA12 BionicA12 BionicScreen5.8-inch OLED (2436 x 1125 pixels)6.5-inch OLED (2688 x 1242 pixels)Storage64GB, 256GB, 512GB64GB, 256GB, ...
    Date2018.09.24 CategoryETC Reply3 Views1571
    Read More
  21. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, RTX 2080 성능 벤치마크 (탐스 하드웨어)

    탐스 하드웨어에서 진행한 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, RTX 2080 파운더스 에디션 벤치마크입니다. 출처  - https://www.tomshardware.com 지포스RTX 2080 Ti, RTX 2080의 성...
    Date2018.09.24 CategoryGPU Reply4 Views1311
    Read More
  22. 엔비디아 튜링 아키텍처 지포스RTX 2080TI, 2080 성능 확인

    엔비디아의 최신 인공지능 수퍼 GPU, RTX 2080TI / 2080의 게임 성능이 공개됐다. 테스트 게임 DirectX 12 Games Battlefield 1 – Ultra Preset Hitman – Highest Settings Shadow of the Tomb Raider – Very High Preset, TAA Star Wars: Battle...
    Date2018.09.15 CategoryGPU Reply4 Views1635
    Read More
  23. AMD 라이젠 스레드리퍼 2990WX, 2970WX, 2950X 벤치마크

    AMD가 새롭게 발표한 라이젠 스레드리퍼2 시리즈의 벤치마크 자료입니다. (탐스 하드웨어) Cores / ThreadsBase / Boost (GHz)L3 Cache (MB) PCIe 3.0 DRAM TDP MSRP Price Per Core AMD TR 2990WX 32 / 64 3.0 / 4.2 64 64 (4 to PCH) Quad DDR4-...
    Date2018.08.18 CategoryCPU Reply3 Views1626
    Read More
  24. 킹스톤 A1000 NVMe SSD 벤치마크, 저렴한 NVMe

    SpecificationsProduct A1000 240GB A1000 480GB A1000 960GB Pricing $86.96 $150.85 $314.99 Form Factor M.2 2280 S3 M.2 2280 S3M.2 2280 S3Interface / Protocol PCIe 3.0 x2 / NVMe 1.2 PCIe 3.0 x2 / NVMe 1.2PCIe 3.0 x2 / NVMe 1.2Controller P...
    Date2018.07.21 CategorySTR Reply0 Views714
    Read More
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24 Next
/ 24