![삼성, 잃어버린 10년 [풀영상] | 창 458회 (KBS 24.03.12) by 인공지능](https://raptor-hw.net/xe/files/thumbnails/453/204/271x205.crop.jpg "삼성, 잃어버린 10년 [풀영상] | 창 458회 (KBS 24.03.12)<br>")
' alt='위대한 인류최대 수퍼로켓 '스타십(Spacex Starship)' 발사 성공 by 인공지능' />
| Plextor M8Pe Series Specifications Comparison | |||||
| 128 GB | 256 GB | 512 GB | 1 TB | ||
| Form Factor | M8PeY: Half height half length PCIe add-in card (HHHL) M8PeG: M.2 2280 with heatspreader M8PeGN: M.2 2280 without heatspreader | ||||
| Controller | Marvell 88SS1093 | ||||
| Interface | NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4 | ||||
| DRAM | 512MB LPDDR3 | 1024MB LPDDR3 | |||
| NAND | Toshiba 15nm MLC | ||||
| Sequential Read | 1600 MB/s | 2000 MB/s | 2300 MB/s | 2500 MB/s | |
| Sequential Write | 500 MB/s | 900 MB/s | 1300 MB/s | 1400 MB/s | |
| 4KB Random Read (QD32) | 120k IOPS | 210k IOPS | 260k IOPS | 280k IOPS | |
| 4KB Random Write (QD32) | 130k IOPS | 230k IOPS | 250k IOPS | 240k IOPS | |
| Endurance | 192 TBW | 384 TBW | 768 TBW | ||
| Warranty | 5 years | ||||
| Price (M.2 only) | $84.95 (66¢/GB) | $163.16 (64¢/GB) | $249.99 (49¢/GB) | $516.57 (51¢/GB) | |
플렉스터의 기업 시장 타겟 Plextor M8Pe (512GB) SSD
컨트롤러 : Marvell 88SS1093
인터페이스 : NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4
캐시 : 512MB LPDDR3 / 1024MB LPDDR3
낸드 : 도시바 15나노 MLC
시퀀셜 읽기 성능 : 1600 MB/s ~ 2500 MB/s
시퀀셜 쓰기 성능 : 500 MB/s ~ 1400 MB/s
4KB 랜덤 읽기 성능 : 120k IOPS ~ 280k IOPS
4KB 랜덤 쓰기 성능 : 130k IOPS ~ 250k IOPS
워런티 : 5년
가격 : $84.95 ~ $516.57
[ 테스트 시스템 ]
| AnandTech 2015 SSD Test System | |
| CPU | Intel Core i7-4770K running at 3.5GHz (Turbo & EIST enabled, C-states disabled) |
| Motherboard | ASUS Z97 Pro (BIOS 2701) |
| Chipset | Intel Z97 |
| Memory | Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2x8GB (9-10-9-27 2T) |
| Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| Desktop Resolution | 1920 x 1200 |
| OS | Windows 8.1 x64 |
On the Light test, the Plextor M8Pe is faster than Intel's PCIe SSDs but slower than OCZ and Samsung. The M8Pe is about 2.6 times faster overall than the best SATA SSDs when the test is run on an empty drive, and about 80% faster when the test is run on a full drive.
When the test is run on an empty drive, the M8Pe is as good as any drive at keeping the number of high-latency outliers low. The M8Pe is more strongly affected than Samsung's drives when the test is run on a full drive.
The data rates on the mixed sequential I/O test are high enough that thermal throttling becomes a factor, and the presence of a heatsink improves the M8Pe's average by 11%. Performance in either configuration is a bit sub-par for an MLC-based PCIe SSD, but it's still at least twice as fast as any SATA SSD.
Power consumption is again the highest of any M.2 PCIe SSD, and efficiency isn't great.
