4월 29일 (월) 오후 7:00
랩터 인터내셔널에 오신걸 환영 합니다
>

logo

  • head
  • news
  • product
  • mobile
  • benchmark
  • analysis
  • computing
  • multimedia

"SAN"은 "Storage Area Network"...
웹 애플리케이션에서의 버퍼 오버...
XSS(크로스 사이트 스크립팅) 취...

amd_rx500_car_678x452.jpg


AMD가 새로 발표한 RX 580 & RX 570 리뷰


AMD Radeon RX Series Specification Comparison
 AMD Radeon RX 580 (8GB)AMD Radeon RX 570AMD Radeon RX 480 (8GB)AMD Radeon RX 470
Stream Processors2304
(36 CUs)
2048
(32 CUs)
2304
(36 CUs)
2048
(32 CUs)
Texture Units144128144128
ROPs32323232
Base Clock1257MHz1168MHz1120MHz926MHz
Boost Clock1340MHz1244MHz1266MHz1206MHz
Memory Clock8 Gbps GDDR57Gbps GDDR58 Gbps GDDR56.6Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width256-bit256-bit256-bit256-bit
VRAM8GB4GB8GB4GB
Transistor Count5.7B5.7B5.7B5.7B
Typical Board Power185W150W150W120W
Manufacturing ProcessGloFo 14nmGloFo 14nmGloFo 14nmGloFo 14nm
ArchitectureGCN 4GCN 4GCN 4GCN 4
GPUPolaris 10Polaris 10Polaris 10Polaris 10
Launch Date04/18/201704/18/201706/29/201608/04/2016
Launch Price$229$169$239$179



라데온 RX 580 & RX 570 시리즈는 기존 480 / 470 시리즈에서 스트림 프로세서, 텍스처 유닛, ROP 동일, 베이스 클럭 및 부스트 클럭 상승, 클럭 상승에 따른 TDP 증가 


가격조정 : 480 = 239달러, 580 = 229달러 / 470 = 179달러, 570 = 169달러


Spring 2017 GPU Pricing Comparison
AMDPriceNVIDIA
Radeon RX 580 (8GB)$229GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB)
Radeon RX 580 (4GB)$199 
Radeon RX 570$169/$179GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
 $129GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Radeon RX 460$99/$104GeForce GTX 1050



라데온 VS 지포스 포지션 테이블, RX 580은 지포스 1060 (6GB) 상대, 570은 1060 (3GB) 모델 상대


PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 580

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 570


[ 테스트 시스템 ]


CPU:Intel Core i7-4960X @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard:ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
Power Supply:Corsair AX1200i
Hard Disk: Samsung SSD 840 EVO (750GB)
Memory:G.Skill RipjawZ DDR3-1866 4 x 8GB (9-10-9-26)
Case:NZXT Phantom 630 Windowed Edition
Monitor:Asus PQ321
Video Cards:PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 580
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 480 (8GB)
AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon R7 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Founder's Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Founder's Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Video Drivers:NVIDIA Release 381.65
AMD Radeon Software Crimson Press Beta 17.10.1030
OS:Windows 10 Pro



Rise of the Tomb Raider

Starting things off in our benchmark suite is the built-in benchmark for Rise of the Tomb Raider, the latest iteration in the long-running action-adventure gaming series. One of the unique aspects of this benchmark is that it’s actually the average of 4 sub-benchmarks that fly through different environments, which keeps the benchmark from being too weighted towards a GPU’s performance characteristics under any one scene.

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality (DX11)

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality (DX11)

 

DiRT Rally

For the racing game in our benchmark suite we have Codemasters’ DiRT Rally. Codemasters continues to set the bar for graphical fidelity in racing games, delivering realistic looking environments with layered with additional graphical effects. Based on their in-house EGO engine, DiRT Rally includes a number of DirectCompute based compute shader effects, and while it’s not the most punishing game in our suite, it still takes a very good card to sustain the 60fps frame rate that driving games are best played at.

DiRT Rally - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

DiRT Rally - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

 


Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

Sorely missing from our benchmark suite for quite some time have been RTSes, which don’t enjoy quite the popularity they once did. As a result Ashes holds a special place in our hearts, and that’s before we talk about the technical aspects. Based on developer Oxide Games’ Nitrous Engine, Ashes has been designed from the ground up for low-level APIs like DirectX 12. As a result of all of the games in our benchmark suite, this is the game making the best use of DirectX 12’s various features, from asynchronous compute to multi-threaded work submission and high batch counts. What we see can’t be extrapolated to all DirectX 12 games, but it gives us a very interesting look at what we might expect in the future.

Ashes of the Singularity - 2560x1440 - Extreme Quality (DX12)

Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 - Extreme Quality (DX12)

 

Battlefield 4

One of the older games in our benchmark suite, DICE’s Battlefield 4 remains a staple of MP gaming. Even at its age, Battlefield 4 remained a challenging game in its own right, as very few mass market MP shooters push the envelope on graphics quality right now. As these benchmarks are from single player mode, based on our experiences our rule of thumb here is that multiplayer framerates will dip to half our single player framerates, which means a card needs to be able to average at least 60fps if it’s to be able to hold up in multiplayer.

Battlefield 4 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

 


Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks 3 years later, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. Crytek’s DX11 masterpiece, Crysis 3’s Very High settings still punish even the best of video cards, never mind the rest. Along with its high performance requirements, Crysis 3 is a rather balanced game in terms of power consumption and vendor optimizations. As a result it can give us a good look at how our video cards stack up on average, and later on in this article how power consumption plays out.

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality + FXAA

 

The Witcher 3

The third game in CD Projekt RED’s expansive RPG series, The Witcher 3 is our RPG benchmark of choice. Utilizing the company’s in-house engine, REDengine 3, The Witcher makes use of an array of DirectX 11 features, all of which combine to make the game both stunning and surprisingly GPU-intensive. Our benchmark is based on an action-heavy in-engine cutscene early in the game, and Hairworks is disabled.

The Witcher 3 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality (No Hairworks)

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality (No Hairworks)

 


Grand Theft Auto V

The latest edition of Rockstar’s venerable series of open world action games, Grand Theft Auto V was originally released to the last-gen consoles back in 2013. However thanks to a rather significant facelift for the current-gen consoles and PCs, along with the ability to greatly turn up rendering distances and add other features like MSAA and more realistic shadows, the end result is a game that is still among the most stressful of our benchmarks when all of its features are turned up. Furthermore, in a move rather uncharacteristic of most open world action games, Grand Theft Auto also includes a very comprehensive benchmark mode, giving us a great chance to look into the performance of an open world action game.

On a quick note about settings, as Grand Theft Auto V doesn't have pre-defined settings tiers, I want to quickly note what settings we're using. For "Very High" quality we have all of the primary graphics settings turned up to their highest setting, with the exception of grass, which is at its own very high setting. Meanwhile 4x MSAA is enabled for direct views and reflections. This setting also involves turning on some of the advanced redering features - the game's long shadows, high resolution shadows, and high definition flight streaming - but it not increasing the view distance any further.

Otherwise for "High" quality we take the same basic settings but turn off all MSAA, which significantly reduces the GPU rendering and VRAM requirements.

Grand Theft Auto V - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality

Grand Theft Auto V - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality

Grand Theft Auto V - 99th Percentile Framerate - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality

Grand Theft Auto V - 99th Percentile Framerate - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality


Compute

Shifting gears, let’s take a look at compute performance on new Radeon RX 500 cards.

Starting us off for our look at compute is LuxMark3.1, the latest version of the official benchmark of LuxRender. LuxRender’s GPU-accelerated rendering mode is an OpenCL based ray tracer that forms a part of the larger LuxRender suite. Ray tracing has become a stronghold for GPUs in recent years as ray tracing maps well to GPU pipelines, allowing artists to render scenes much more quickly than with CPUs alone.

Compute: LuxMark 3.1 - Hotel

For our second set of compute benchmarks we have CompuBench 1.5, the successor to CLBenchmark. CompuBench offers a wide array of different practical compute workloads, and we’ve decided to focus on face detection, optical flow modeling, and particle simulations.

Compute: CompuBench 1.5 - Face Detection

Compute: CompuBench 1.5 - Optical Flow

Compute: CompuBench 1.5 - Particle Simulation 64K

 



Idle Power Consumption


Load Power Consumption - Crysis 3



출처 - http://www.anandtech.com

  • profile
    랩터 인터내셔널 2017.04.23 19:15
    오늘도 즐거운 하루되세요^^
  • profile
    레오파드 2017.04.23 19:20
    음.. 지포스 1060이 너무 강력하네요
  • ?
    디스커버리 2017.05.01 10:39
    성능도 별론데 전력소모는 상상 초월
  • ?
    태원 2017.05.01 11:19
    공정 최적화도 아니고, 아키텍처 최적화도 아니고, 단순히 클럭만 조금 올렸을 뿐인데 전력소모는 왜 저럴까여.. 이 상태로 라데온 그래픽 사업을 계속 할수 있을지
  • ?
    프로그래머 2017.05.03 16:30
    GPU 계의 불도저네요
  • ?
    고해상도 2017.05.09 14:26
    14나노 공정기술이 많이 떨어져 보입니다






List of Articles
제목 날짜 조회 수
마이크로소프트 서피스 프로4 CPU,GPU,낸드 성능 2015.10.30 167143
인텔 카비레이크 Core i7 7700K 리뷰 - 새로운 챔피언 2017.01.24 84842
인텔 옵테인 SSD 900p 480GB 리뷰 : Diving Deeper Into 3D XPoint 2017.12.25 75737
18개의 CPU 쿨러 벤치마크 1 2009.12.01 69126
세계 1위 게임, 배틀그라운드를 통한 인텔 vs AMD CPU 성능 비교 3 2017.12.30 58054
인텔 스카이레이크X 7900X, 7820X, 7800X, 카비레이크X 7740 테스트 2017.06.25 57478
[8086 40주년 기념판] The Intel Core i7-8086K Review 2018.06.11 56999
지포스 GTX295 & 285 벤치마크 2009.03.16 54463
AMD 라이젠3 1300X, 1200 vs. 인텔 i3 7100 / G4560 대결 2 2017.07.29 33908
라이젠 1800X+지포스GTX 1080TI 조합 vs 인텔 조합 게임 대결 2017.03.11 30322
태블릿 황제, 마이크로소프트 서피스 프로 공식 리뷰 8 2013.02.08 30114
하스웰 내장 그래픽 인텔 아이리스 프로 그래픽 5200 성능 (HD4600포함) 3 2013.06.02 28230
인텔 하스웰 펜티엄 G3430,G3420,G3220 성능 2013.09.17 24369
4890CF vs GTX 285 SLI 벤치마크 2 2009.04.24 23881
게이밍 환경에서 AMD 라이젠 vs. 인텔 CPU 성능 비교 6 2017.06.11 23163
AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB Review, Polaris 12 GPU 3 2017.05.01 22851
윈도우7 vs 윈도우 8.1 배틀필드4 성능 비교 벤치마크 2013.10.15 22364
인텔 베이트레일 성능 공식 리뷰, 태블릿도 인텔의 시대가 시작 5 2013.09.12 21277
AMD 잠베지 FX 6100, FX 4100의 성능은? 6 2011.12.16 21007
지포스 9800GT vs 지포스GTX 660의 성능 차이 (과거와 현재) 2012.09.24 20979
삼성 PM981 SSD 리뷰 : Next Generation Controller And 3D NAND 2017.12.25 20296
AMD 카비니 리뷰 : A4 5000 APU 테스트 2013.05.25 20146
충격과 공포의 샌디브릿지 성능 6 2011.01.03 19007
AMD 라데온RX 580 & RX 570 리뷰 : A Second Path to Polaris 6 2017.04.23 18337
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26 Next
/ 26