5월 2일 (목) 오전 5:32
랩터 인터내셔널에 오신걸 환영 합니다
>

logo

  • head
  • news
  • product
  • mobile
  • benchmark
  • analysis
  • computing
  • multimedia

우리 삶을 혁신적으로 바꾸고 있...
"SAN"은 "Storage Area Network"...
웹 애플리케이션에서의 버퍼 오버...
140mm Tower CPU Coolers
ProductFan(s)Fan Speed (RPM)Height (mm/in)Current Retail Pricing
Noctua NH-U14S1 × 140 mm1500 RPM165 mm / 6.5”$65
Phanteks PH-TC14S1 × 140 mm1300 RPM160 mm / 6.3”$50
ThermalRight True Spirit 140 Direct1 × 140 mm1600 RPM161 mm / 6.34”$47
Be Quiet! Shadow Rock Slim1 × 140 mm1400 RPM161 mm / 6.34”$50


140mm 슬림 타워 CPU 쿨러 4종 벤치마크 - http://www.anandtech.com


선수

녹투아 NH-U14S

팬텍스 PH-TC14S

써멀라이트 True Spirit 140 Direct

비콰이엇 Shadow Rock Slim


가격은 47달러 ~ 65달러


녹투아



팬텍스





비콰이엇






써멀라이트






[ 테스트 장비 ]




Testing Results: Maximum Fan Speed

To start things off, let's take a look at the peak cooling performance of our four tower coolers. We should note that the Phanteks PH-TC14S is once again the oddity of this review, with its fan reaching 1520 RPM. The specifications of the PH-F140HP fan state a very broad maximum speed range of 1300 ± 250 RPM, so our reading is within the fan’s specifications, yet this is the first time that we have encountered a fan spinning that much faster than its rated speed.

Fan Speed (12 Volts)

Noise level

With their fans running at their maximum speed, the best overall thermal performance comes from Thermalright’s True Spirit 140 Direct. Noctua’s NH-U14S handles high loads a little better, but Thermalright’s offering has a very strong advantage at lower loads, suggesting more efficient heat transfer due to its direct contact design. 

Average Thermal Resistance

The Be Quiet! Shadow Rock Slim falls a little behind in terms of thermal performance but only by a couple of degrees, which is acceptable considering that it had the lowest noise reading of this review. Considering the overall design of the cooler and that it has a smaller number of heatpipes in comparison to every other cooler in this review, its top speed performance is surprisingly good.

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Max Fan Speed)
60 W Load100 W Load150 W Load200 W Load250 W Load340 W Load

Although its thermal performance is satisfactory, the Phanteks PH-TC14S falls behind the other three coolers of this review. It is both slightly louder and less efficient, especially when it has to deal with very high thermal loads. The difference however is small and a more carefully designed revision can easily turn the tables.



Testing Results: Low Fan Speed

As most users don't actually need the fans of a tower cooler running at peak performance (and peak noise), let's also take a look at what kind of performance these coolers provide at lower fan speeds.

Broadly speaking, all four of the coolers that we tested for this review were capable of sustaining reasonable operating temperatures with thermal loads above 200 Watts, even with the speed of their fans greatly reduced.

Fan Speed (7 Volts)

Noise level

There are virtually no differences between these four coolers in relation to our previous test, with the Thermalright True Spirit 140 Direct again displaying the best overall thermal resistance and excellent efficiency with the handling of low thermal loads. However, the Noctua NH-U14S greatly outperforms all other coolers when it comes to the handling of very high thermal loads, suggesting that it can maintain reasonable operating temperatures on overclocked processors alongside with virtually inaudible noise levels.

Average Thermal Resistance

Once again, the Be Quiet! Shadow Rock Slim falls slightly behind the Noctua NH-U14S and the Thermalright True Spirit 140 Direct. The thermal resistance is only slightly worse but this time the Shadow Rock Slim also has no real advantage in terms of acoustics, as the difference between all four of the coolers is practically indiscernible.

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Low Fan Speed)
60 W Load100 W Load150 W Load200 W Load250 W Load340 W Load

Finally, the Phanteks PH-TC14S displayed the lowest overall performance figures, with slightly worse thermal resistance than all of the coolers in this roundup review. Although the Phanteks PH-TC14S displays thermal performance similar to that of the other coolers at lower loads, the difference widens greatly when the thermal load is very high, suggesting that the cooler is at its limit in handling the excessive thermal energy flow.



출처 - http://www.anandtech.com






  1. 23Sep
    by

    LG V30 리뷰, 현존 안드로이드 최고 스마트폰

  2. 02Sep
    by

    화제의 배틀그라운드 CPU 성능비교, 인텔 7700K vs 라이젠 1800X

  3. 15Aug
    by

    라데온RX 베가 56 & 64 성능 확인 (Radeon RX Vega 64 & 56)

  4. 15Aug
    by

    AMD 라데온 베가 RX 64 8GB vs. 지포스GTX 1080 성능비교

  5. 11Aug
    by

    공식) AMD 라이젠 스레드리퍼 1950X 성능 확인

  6. 29Jul
    by

    AMD 라이젠3 1300X, 1200 vs. 인텔 i3 7100 / G4560 대결

  7. 01Jul
    by

    AMD 라데온 베가 프론티어 에디션 16GB 성능 공개

  8. 25Jun
    by

    인텔 스카이레이크X 7900X, 7820X, 7800X, 카비레이크X 7740 테스트

  9. 11Jun
    by

    게이밍 환경에서 AMD 라이젠 vs. 인텔 CPU 성능 비교

  10. 27May
    by 아키텍트

    5~6만원선 140mm 슬림 타워 CPU 쿨러 4종 벤치마크

  11. 13May
    by

    갤럭시 S8 Vs. LG G6 카메라 성능 비교 (ITworld)

  12. 01May
    by

    AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB Review, Polaris 12 GPU

  13. 23Apr
    by

    AMD 라데온RX 580 & RX 570 리뷰 : A Second Path to Polaris

  14. 16Apr
    by

    AMD 라이젠5 1600X, 1500X 성능 vs 인텔 7600k

  15. 08Apr
    by

    퀄컴 스냅드래곤 835 vs 애플 A10 AP 성능 비교

  16. 11Mar
    by

    라이젠 1800X+지포스GTX 1080TI 조합 vs 인텔 조합 게임 대결

  17. 10Mar
    by

    지포스GTX 1080TI 성능, 파스칼 타이탄X보다 상위

  18. 05Mar
    by

    라이젠 1800X vs 브로드웰-E 6900K vs 카비레이크 7700K 한판

  19. 04Mar
    by

    AMD 라이젠 1800X vs 인텔 Core i7-5960X 성능 비교

  20. 03Mar
    by

    AMD 라이젠 1800X, 1700X, 1700 정식 벤치마크 (게임 성능 제외)

  21. 10Feb
    by

    쿼드코어 샌디브릿지 2600K vs 듀얼코어 카비레이크 7350K 성능 대결

  22. 24Jan
    by

    인텔 카비레이크 Core i7 7700K 리뷰 - 새로운 챔피언

  23. 04Jan
    by

    엔비디아 쿼드로 P6000 테스트, 파스칼 타이탄X 격파

  24. 30Dec
    by

    플렉스터 M8Pe 512GB SSD 리뷰 (NVMe PCIe 3.0)

Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26 Next
/ 26